Skip to content
Sample dossier Automation Systems architecture deliverable for Kova.
Request your Automation Systems →

Systems engineering · Stage 04 sample output

Kova

ERP implementation consulting for mid-market companies

This is an illustrative example. The company scenario and figures show how the work is presented; they are not reported client results or promised outcomes.

Automation Systems architecture workbook on workspace desk
Fig. 01 / Kova Automation Architecture Illustrative sample
Company
Kova Consulting
Sector
ERP solutions
Timeline
4–6 weeks
Strategist
Apostolos Bolkas

Executive memorandum

Commercial mandate & context

Kova is an eight-person consulting firm helping mid-market enterprises implement ERP systems. When we began, they were managing more than 40 active client engagements with an entirely manual back office: form submissions copied by hand into HubSpot, lead follow-ups sent from personal inboxes, and pipeline numbers tracked in a spreadsheet updated twice a week.

The brief: map every manual touchpoint, automate the stable recurring workflows, and hand over a resilient system that the internal team can manage independently without ongoing consultant retainers.

  • 2 min

    Lead response time

    Down from 4.2 hours (−99%)

  • 98%

    CRM data accuracy

    Up from 61% baseline (+37pp)

  • 11 hrs / wk

    Manual hours saved

    Reallocated to client delivery

  • 0

    Leads lost to lag

    Down from six per month

System index

4 sections

Architecture specs

Usually four–six weeks • €6,000–€9,000 flat fee

01 · Process mapping

Before vs after

Transformation across the conversion lifecycle

We mapped every manual touchpoint where inbound enquiries stalled and replaced individual guesswork with clear deterministic logic.

Previous manual flow

Manual lag

  1. 01

    Lead submits enquiry

    Checked manually from email. Average lag of 4.2 hours before entry into CRM.

  2. 02

    Consultant assignment

    Assigned by partner memory. No capacity tracking or routing rules.

  3. 03

    Initial follow-up

    Sent from personal inboxes when time allowed, ranging from same day to day three.

  4. 04

    Pipeline updates

    Google Sheet updated twice weekly. Consistently out of sync with actual conversations.

  5. 05

    Proposal creation

    Shared informally during Monday syncs, missing high-intent buyer momentum.

Automated system state

Zero friction

  1. 01

    Instant CRM contact creation

    Form data creates and enriches HubSpot contact instantly with source attribution.

  2. 02

    Rule-based smart routing

    Automated routing based on industry sector and consultant capacity.

  3. 03

    Two-minute follow-up trigger

    Personalised email sequence triggered within two minutes with consultant context.

  4. 04

    Real-time pipeline ledger

    CRM updates continuously with automated Monday executive reporting digests.

  5. 05

    Instant proposal alert

    Direct Slack notification to partner channel the moment a deal enters proposal stage.

02 · Automation inventory

Production workflows

Five live core automations

Each workflow was engineered with strict triggers, validated destinations, and assigned internal owners.

  1. 01

    Status: live

    Lead capture & data enrichment sync

    Creates or enriches HubSpot records on form submission. Maps service tier, headcount, and referral source with email deduplication.

    Trigger
    Typeform submission
    Destination
    HubSpot CRM
    Owner
    Operations lead
  2. 02

    Status: live

    Intelligent consultant routing

    Assigns qualified leads to the best-matched consultant based on technical domain and current capacity. Delivers instant Slack alert with deal overview.

    Trigger
    New CRM contact created
    Destination
    HubSpot owner assignment + Slack
    Owner
    Operations lead
  3. 03

    Status: live

    Immediate follow-up sequence

    Dispatches a contextual personal email within two minutes using the assigned consultant signature, automatically pausing upon buyer response.

    Trigger
    Lead assigned in CRM
    Destination
    HubSpot email automation
    Owner
    Assigned consultant
  4. 04

    Status: live

    Weekly executive pipeline digest

    Compiles weekly pipeline metrics, active deal stages, and stalled conversations into an automated briefing without manual spreadsheet exports.

    Trigger
    Every Monday at 08:00 AM
    Destination
    Leadership email group
    Owner
    Operations lead
  5. 05

    Status: live

    Proposal stage notification

    Alerts executive leadership immediately when high-value proposals are requested, surfacing client scope and estimated contract value.

    Trigger
    Deal moves to Proposal stage
    Destination
    Slack #deals channel
    Owner
    Managing partner

03 · Integration map

Tool connectivity & logic

How data moves across the architecture

We favoured native API connections over fragile third-party middleware to reduce potential points of failure.

Key architectural decisions

  • Direct Typeform to HubSpot integration: Built using native CRM data mapping rather than third-party webhooks to minimise data latency and eliminate middleware costs.
  • HubSpot internal workflow logic: Consolidated routing rules, sequence enrolment, and notification triggers inside CRM workflows so the internal team owns all operational rules in one place.
  • Slack native alerting: Leveraged standard channel connectors to deliver real-time deal alerts directly to mobile without custom webhook infrastructure.

04 · Handover governance

Maintenance & monitoring

Self-sustaining operational governance

The system was built to be run entirely by internal staff, accompanied by clear monitoring routines and change request guidelines.

Monitoring protocol

Weekly review of CRM workflow execution history to verify zero failed enrolments or sync warnings.

Change protocol

All adjustments to lead routing logic or copy sequences are tested in a sandbox contact environment prior to production deployment.

The strategic diagnosis

The previous four-hour response delay was never an employee dedication issue. The team was responsive, but they had no underlying architecture that made responding in two minutes possible. Every hour of delay was a structural system flaw disguised as a workload bottleneck. Automation did not force people to work harder, it eliminated the structural friction entirely.

Methodology

Built to be handed over and owned.

Not locked into expensive software retainers. The Automation Systems engagement includes:

  • Current state audit

    Full assessment of your existing software, manual data handoffs, and team responsibilities.

  • System architecture blueprint

    Complete data schema, field mapping definitions, and logic flowcharts documented before building.

  • Prioritised automation backlog

    A structured roadmap ranking integrations by commercial impact, technical feasibility, and speed.

  • Custom integration engineering

    Expert build covering APIs, CRM connections, webhooks, and automated email sequences.

  • Standard operating procedures

    Clear written and video documentation tailored for your team to understand and maintain.

  • Handover & governance QA

    End-to-end edge-case testing, error monitoring setup, and verified team walkthroughs before sign-off.